Once again, you can respond in any substantive and non-qualitative fashion you wish to the piece. (Again, this is not the place to say whether you "liked it" or not; nor should you feel inclined to put in your two-cents about what you'd cut if you were the editor.)
You might want to consider thinking about the ways in which this piece is about the Maine Lobster Festival, and also much more. What kind of work is Wallace, as the narrative perspective of the piece, doing? What could be a different way of approaching this subject, and what might be gained or lost from those alternative approaches?
Remember to write a minimum of 250 words to receive credit and to respond to one of your peers' posts as well.
